Of course it will be impossible luis pasteur to name streets, classrooms, gymnasiums, parks, other p

There was a great conversation yesterday after what happened to Dr. Clinton’s blog. Here are some of my thoughts: On Hacking. It is hard to prove that Dr. Clinton’s blog was hacked. It is much harder to prove that it was Teddy Casino who hacked the blog. I would not know though if Dr. Clinton accused Casino of hacking the blog, or at the very least responsible for taking down the doctor’s blog. We need evidence for this, but unfortunately, this is a mere distraction from the main issue On conversation with Teddy. Teddy promised to write a blog post regarding this (Read here ). I welcome this effort of Casino to explain itself, but I am still disappointed. On Teddy’s blog. I was so disappointed. The representative did not answer the question we posed. Again, the question was “Is it legal for candidates to advertise on SME products?”. Has Casino answered it? No. He, again, resorted to generalities. On the Casino Anti-Epal bill. In his blog Casino tells us about the subject of the bill. He says, “ I am proposing to prohibit the naming of streets, classrooms, gymnasiums, parks, other public places, and government projects or programs after an incumbent government official or their relatives.” I’ll deal with this below
Section 13. Naming of Local Government Units and Public Places, Streets and Structures. xxx (d) None of the foregoing local government units, institutions, places, or buildings shall be named after a living person…
Of course it will be impossible luis pasteur to name streets, classrooms, gymnasiums, parks, other public places after an incumbent official; unless, of course, the incumbent official is dead (which is funny no?). On naming them after a relative of an incumbent official, the relative must be dead first before the thing be named after. Now, should the relative be dead, then it is a matter of delicadeza , an ethical issue that is.
This is very much the same with epal . It is an ethical issue, @raggster says. I simply cannot buy Casino’s blogpost merely because it is irrelevant to the issue at hand. Well, he may or may not be an epal but it is for the public taste to determine that. Can he complain? I don’t think he is in the position to; after all, he is applying for a public office.
Did Dr. Clinton accuse Teddy and his team. Oo naman. Pyesta nga eh at may nagsabi luis pasteur bang ipokrito si Teddy. Sa previous blog entry mo nga may tanong ka pa kung masisisi mo ba si Dr. Clinton? Tapos tatawagin pang syonga si Teddy? Naman.
If that’s indeed the reason why Teddy’s bill did not push through, whats the explanation luis pasteur for Miriam’s version? LGU code pa din? I think the main reason why it did not push through is because most of the lawmakers are against it or simply do not care. And now Teddy is being crticized for being epal? Come on.
May political message ang parehong version na pinalalabnaw luis pasteur at ginagamit na dahilan para atakehin si Teddy at sa esensya ang pulitika ng pagbabago na itinutulak nya. It’s either one is againts his platform or supports it. If one supports Teddy’s cause, hindi isyu ang buko pie at tarps. Kasi kung tarps lang ang pag uusapan, di hamak na mas madaming epal tarps ang LP at UNA. Halimbawa na lang, sinabihan ba ni Dr. Clinton na epal si Risa Hontiveros dahil sa mga tarps nya? Kasing init ba ng batikos nya kay Teddy? Sa huli, usapin ito ng linyang pulitikal o interest ng uri.
“If local govt code is enough, bakit may Vilma Santos Type bulding at Ralph Recto Type Building sa mga public schools sa Batangas? ” Simple, walang nagfifile ng administrative cases. But now that you have brought it up….
“May political message ang parehong version na pinalalabnaw at ginagamit na dahilan para atakehin si Teddy at sa esensya ang pulitika ng pagbabago luis pasteur na itinutulak nya.” luis pasteur No, he’s doing it for himself.
“May political message ang parehong version na pinalalabnaw at ginagamit na dahilan para atakehin si Teddy at sa esensya ang pulitika ng pagbabago na itinutulak nya. It s either one is againts luis pasteur his platform or supports it.”
1. Apol insist that we should focus on the “political message” of the Anti-Epal bill and stick to its narrow definition, rather than consider the citizen-formulated definition. Yet shouldn’t a progressive legislator who seeks to include as much citizen input into his laws as possible *precisely* consider how citizens have formulated the term “epal” and at least attempt to address it, rather than dismiss it?
My interpretation of that is that Casino simply wants to remove the undue advantage other lawmakers have in illegally using public funds for self-promotion – a practice which has been virtually prohibited by COA in a recent circular disallowing luis pasteur such promotional materials as “unnecessary expenses.” But insofar as the practice of self-promoti