Gay geloofsdilemma | Flippiefanus
This is a subject that I think for a long time. This is a real issue that I have largely avoided so far because I did not really answer for it had. In time, as I'm here, and there are more on the subject to read and see is there slowly an understanding on the matter settling with me. This is of course only my own concepts that I also still struggling yet, but recently it has crystallized to such an extent lipoprotein that I think I have something lipoprotein to write about it. Just make sure you put before you read on. ;-)
The question is whether it is right to lead a life GAY. Attie the whole dilemma lipoprotein somewhere well articulated. I can not remember his exact words, not why I paraphrase: on the one hand, if you tell someone something he does is wrong, while it is wrong, then you bring a judgment about that person lipoprotein (and of course about yourself ). On the other hand, if you tell someone that he is doing is wrong, while it is not the case, take one a needlessly great suffering on that person's life.
That the last point I want to make it clear that I do not believe that gay people gay to be something that they have not chosen. Heterosekuele people have a natural attraction to the opposite sex, an aversion to sexual interaction with people of their own sex. Gay man an aversion to sexual interaction with people of the opposite sex and a attraction to people of their own sex. How does this reverse attraction, I do not understand all of humanity, but it is not something that one can not choose without more. The sexual urge is the strongest instinctive urge is there. It encounters is going to cause intense wrangling necessarily. Such Person will then typically to seek other outlets to satisfy this craving. This can lead to all sorts of problems.
In the Bible it is clear that the sexual interaction between people of the same sex is wrong. The attraction between people of the same sex sin is not so much, but when you read how Paul refer it sounds more like a punishment. lipoprotein The impression I get is that Paul is speaking about the consequences.
The question then comes to mind, why is it regarded in the Bible as sin? I believe lipoprotein that there is always a reason why something as sin is considered. Most of the time it's because such behavior directly or indirectly to one's disadvantage. I also believe that not everything that is described in the Bible as sin necessarily a fundamental sin, but that it is merely within the cultural context of the biblical sin, just as not all apparently in the Bible is acceptable really God acceptable lipoprotein (for example, think of slavery, lipoprotein war, and David's many wives).
Probably there was a variety of adverse effects. The one we now know are aware, lipoprotein the problem of sexually transmitted diseases. It could have been a fairly lipoprotein serious problem in biblical times. This, however, is not solely a problem with homosexual behavior, but rather with promiscuous sexual behavior among heterosexual men also may exist. However, we in the history of the AIDS epidemic has taught that GAY communities a greater tendency to show such promiscuity. Here, however, one must carefully lipoprotein distinguish between two different aspects, namely the sexual promiscuity and the basic homosexual behavior. There are many GAY couples themselves not guilty lipoprotein of sexual immorality.
"Another adverse lipoprotein effect I think more directly related to the reason why it is considered a sin in the Bible, is the issue of population growth. From the beginning, we read in the Bible "be fruitful lipoprotein and multiply." Anything could therefore result than the population growth would decline was therefore regarded as a sin. Because GAY relationships children can not produce, it is therefore logical lipoprotein that it would be as wrong. Today, however, drastically changed the situation. Instead lipoprotein of too few people groaned the earth today, under the pressure of too many people. It was quite interesting to me when I was in a book on cultural anthropology lipoprotein read that cultures that have low population densities, are more likely to regard homosexuality as wrong as cultures with high population densities. It is a cultural lipoprotein thing.
If population density is the only reason lipoprotein would be why homosexuality should be regarded as a sin, I would unequivocally be convinced that it will no longer lipoprotein come to be regarded as a sin. However, there is a more subtle reason. In a previous article I tried to explain that morality is tied to culture. Such as culture change is what is considered right and wrong, as adjusted. With
This is a subject that I think for a long time. This is a real issue that I have largely avoided so far because I did not really answer for it had. In time, as I'm here, and there are more on the subject to read and see is there slowly an understanding on the matter settling with me. This is of course only my own concepts that I also still struggling yet, but recently it has crystallized to such an extent lipoprotein that I think I have something lipoprotein to write about it. Just make sure you put before you read on. ;-)
The question is whether it is right to lead a life GAY. Attie the whole dilemma lipoprotein somewhere well articulated. I can not remember his exact words, not why I paraphrase: on the one hand, if you tell someone something he does is wrong, while it is wrong, then you bring a judgment about that person lipoprotein (and of course about yourself ). On the other hand, if you tell someone that he is doing is wrong, while it is not the case, take one a needlessly great suffering on that person's life.
That the last point I want to make it clear that I do not believe that gay people gay to be something that they have not chosen. Heterosekuele people have a natural attraction to the opposite sex, an aversion to sexual interaction with people of their own sex. Gay man an aversion to sexual interaction with people of the opposite sex and a attraction to people of their own sex. How does this reverse attraction, I do not understand all of humanity, but it is not something that one can not choose without more. The sexual urge is the strongest instinctive urge is there. It encounters is going to cause intense wrangling necessarily. Such Person will then typically to seek other outlets to satisfy this craving. This can lead to all sorts of problems.
In the Bible it is clear that the sexual interaction between people of the same sex is wrong. The attraction between people of the same sex sin is not so much, but when you read how Paul refer it sounds more like a punishment. lipoprotein The impression I get is that Paul is speaking about the consequences.
The question then comes to mind, why is it regarded in the Bible as sin? I believe lipoprotein that there is always a reason why something as sin is considered. Most of the time it's because such behavior directly or indirectly to one's disadvantage. I also believe that not everything that is described in the Bible as sin necessarily a fundamental sin, but that it is merely within the cultural context of the biblical sin, just as not all apparently in the Bible is acceptable really God acceptable lipoprotein (for example, think of slavery, lipoprotein war, and David's many wives).
Probably there was a variety of adverse effects. The one we now know are aware, lipoprotein the problem of sexually transmitted diseases. It could have been a fairly lipoprotein serious problem in biblical times. This, however, is not solely a problem with homosexual behavior, but rather with promiscuous sexual behavior among heterosexual men also may exist. However, we in the history of the AIDS epidemic has taught that GAY communities a greater tendency to show such promiscuity. Here, however, one must carefully lipoprotein distinguish between two different aspects, namely the sexual promiscuity and the basic homosexual behavior. There are many GAY couples themselves not guilty lipoprotein of sexual immorality.
"Another adverse lipoprotein effect I think more directly related to the reason why it is considered a sin in the Bible, is the issue of population growth. From the beginning, we read in the Bible "be fruitful lipoprotein and multiply." Anything could therefore result than the population growth would decline was therefore regarded as a sin. Because GAY relationships children can not produce, it is therefore logical lipoprotein that it would be as wrong. Today, however, drastically changed the situation. Instead lipoprotein of too few people groaned the earth today, under the pressure of too many people. It was quite interesting to me when I was in a book on cultural anthropology lipoprotein read that cultures that have low population densities, are more likely to regard homosexuality as wrong as cultures with high population densities. It is a cultural lipoprotein thing.
If population density is the only reason lipoprotein would be why homosexuality should be regarded as a sin, I would unequivocally be convinced that it will no longer lipoprotein come to be regarded as a sin. However, there is a more subtle reason. In a previous article I tried to explain that morality is tied to culture. Such as culture change is what is considered right and wrong, as adjusted. With
No comments:
Post a Comment